Questions   
Sort: 
 #1
avatar+118725 
0
Guest:

Problem #48:
In the August 2005 issue of Consumer Reports, readers suffering from depression reported that alternative treatments were less effective than prescription drugs. Suppose that 550 readers felt better taking prescription drugs, 220 felt better through meditation, and 45 felt better taking St. John's wort. Furthermore, 95 felt better using prescription drugs and meditation, 17 felt better using prescription drugs and St. John's wort, 35 felt better using meditation and St. John's wort, 15 improved using all three treatments, and 150 improved using none of these treatments. (Hypothetical results are partly based on percentages given in Consumer Reports.)


How many readers suffering from depression were included in the report? Of those included in the report.
b.How many felt better using prescription drugs or mediation?
c. How many felt better using St. John's wort only?
d. How many improved using prescription drugs and meditation, but not St. John's wort?
e. How many improved using prescription drugs or St. John's wort, but not meditation?
f. How many improved using exactly two of these treatments?
g.How many improved using at least one of these treatments?


------------------------------------------------------
The question is a little bit ambiguous but I think that this is what it means
"220 felt better through meditation" includes all people who felt better who had used meditation, they may have used prescription drugs and/or St John's wart as well, that is not important.
It also tell us nothing about how many people used meditation and did not feel better. I have defined the other statements in a similar way.

So now what you start with is 3 overlapping circles. In the parts that don't overlap, write, presciptions, meditation and St John's wort respectively.
Now just start putting the numbers in starting in the very middle.
15 people felt better after using all 3.
now.
35 people felt better after using meditation and St john's wort. that goes in the correct overlap, but wait, there are already 3 in their. 35-3=32 so 32 goes in the other bit of the overlap.
And so on.
just keep subtracting and putting answers in the correct spots.
oh, 150 improved using none of these.
You will have to put the 3 circles inside a big rectangle and put 150 outside the circles but in the rectangle.

What you are drawing is called a Venn diagram (My brother's name is Ven so it was easy for me to remember.) It is a very useful tool for these types of question.

Now, if you have drawn it properly you should be able to work out the answers from the diagram.
Get back to me and let me know how you go.
Dec 19, 2013
 #1
avatar
0
Dec 19, 2013
Dec 18, 2013
 #2
avatar+330 
0
Marshall wrote:The aspect ratio of a tv screen is the ratio of width to height of the image. A regular TV has an aspect ratio of 4:3. Find the height and width of a 42in. Tv screen to the nearest tenth of an inch. (the measure given is the length of the diagonal across the screen.)


Reply:

Televisions with glass envelope CRTs were measured diagonally. The aspect ratio was always 4:3 (except for special purpose tubes), so measuring the diagonal for tube size was uniform and simple. Modern LCD and plasma type flat-screen TVs are still measured this way. However, with this diagonal measure an aspect ratio is included. The common aspect ratios are 5:4, 4:3, 16:10, 5:3 (sometimes labeled as 15:9), and 16:9.

All of these TVs can have a 42 inch (diagonal) display size, but they will not necessarily display a desirable image. As an extreme example: you could have a TV that has a 42 inch diagonal but is only 4 inches high.

Melody is essentially correct as the formula is a rearrangement of the Pythagorean theorem.

(However, it should be written as
42/5 = Width/4
and
42/5 = Height/3)

The actual formula for this construct is

Height= D * SQR(H 2)/(W 2+H 2)
Width= W/H * D * SQR(H 2)/(W 2+H 2)

Where D is the diagonal measure and
W and H are the aspect ratio expressed as W:H.

It is readily discernible that as ratios increase from 5:4 to 16:9, the angle of the diagonal decreases and, the viewing area (in square units) decreases for any given constant diagonal. In the case of 42 inches it decreases from 847in 2 to 754in 2

BTW I responded to your follow-up question "Need Help Nowwwwww" (Which would have greater continuity if posted here).

--D--
Dec 18, 2013

0 Online Users