Very interesting observation!! Did you come up with this scheme yourself? It would have been much more interesting if Row 3 produced ONLY primes, instead of listing all the counting numbers from 1 to infinity, such as this famous observation by Euler: x^2 + x + 41. If you start with 1 and sub it into the equation, it will produce only prime numbers up to 41. Beyond that, it was proven by two mathematicians, that up to 10,000,000 the equation gives 50% primes and 50% composites!.
Another observation. If 705 in Row 3 produces a number in Rows 1 and 2 that is 148 digits long, how big a number would the 1,000,000th number in Row 3 produce in Row 1 and 2?
Is this some new observation or has been known to number theorists for a while? With such large numbers in Rows 1 and 2, maybe number theorists can prove or disprove it in a much more clever ways.