All Answers 358180 Answers

It's undefined..to see why......note that

12/3 = 4......because 4 * 3 = 12

But....what about 0 / 0  ??

It could be 2, because 2 * 0 = 0

Or...it could be pi, because pi * 0 = 0

Or.....it could be 11, because 11  * 0 = 0

In essence......we can't tell what it might be......!!

The Riddle of the Sphinx....!!!

The answer....man

4 legs in the morning......he crawls when he's a baby

2 legs  for most of his life

3 legs when he's old... (in the "evening")....{he walks with a cane when he's old}

Its 1.8262

A human, figuratively speaking...

In infancy, one crawls on all fours, then learns to walk on two legs. In old age, one would walk on two legs with the assistance of a cane, hence 3 legs.

but watto if it is trick question could it  equal infinity ?

55 in the next number in the sequence

The corrrect answer is false

Nothing divided by nothing is nothing, mate

Use a proportion to solve this problem.

54/1.5=x/4

54 times 4 is 216.

216/1.5=144.

So there will be 144 schools delayed if there are 4 inches of snow.

Every number to the power of 0 is 1, so 5^0=1

square root of 144 is 12.....

Adding a negative number is basically subtracting the opposite of the negative number.

10+(-40) is the same as 10-40, which is 30

The answer is -30.

99 + 9/9 =

99 + 1 =

100

(-1+(-8-14))x5

(-1+(-22))x5

-23x5=-115

17.4 / .2 =  87 "toonies"

{BTW....what's a "toonie'....??}

You already have one solution....look at the first equation

-2 + y = 2     add 2 to both sides

y = 4

Now....put this value into the second equation for "y' and you should be able to solve for x.....

It's 2.97.

And if we wanted an "exact" value...it would be... 6√2.....

√(2v-7)=v-3     .... square both sides to get rid of the radical

2v - 7  = v^2 - 6v + 9    rearrange

v^2 - 8v + 16   = 0        factor

(v - 4)^2  = 0      and it's obvious that 4 is our solution

Make sure you check the solutions to this type of problem......the squaring of both sides sometimes results in "extraneous" solutions that don't "work" in the original equation.....fortunately, this one is OK.....!!!

Ah.....a little tricky, aren't we???  I forgot about those "leftover" butts.....!!

{I would have failed this one....LOL!!}

Here you go......

ln(x) - ln(10)  =  ln(9)

Two log expressions that create a subtraction problem can be replaced with one log expression of a division.

--->  ln(x) - ln(10)  =  ln(x/10)

So:  ln(x/10)  =  ln(9)

This statement is true only if  x/10  =  9   --->  x = 90

I've recommended that one for our Daily Wrap.......a very gpod effort, indeed!!

If you know that the triangle is a right triangle, use the Pythagorean Theorem.

If you don't know that it is a right triangle, you can't find the third side unless you have more information; for instance, the size of the angle between the two sides that you know.

ahaha cheers i was quite familiar with that problem