Questions   
Sort: 
 #1
 #2
avatar
0
Jan 20, 2014
 #3
avatar+56 
0
Melody:
Walt:

To find the largest possible square that would fit into your garden, we would have to find the largest perfect square that will divide into 6912, which is the area of the garden. 256 is the largest perfect square to divide into 6912 and when you divide you get 27. This means that you could make 27 squares with equal areas that would fit inside your garden. Because a square's length and width are always the same, you just find the square root of 256 and you got your sides. So, 16 feet.



a garden measures 64 ft by 108 ft. the gardener wishes to subdivide the garden into congruent squares. what is the side length of the largest squares possible?

But Walt, 108 divided by 16 = 6.75 so there is not a 'whole' number of squares in the length.

For the moment, this question has got me stumped. I don't have a lot of time to think about it today, I definitely want to play with this question.

Sorry for the moment.
Melody.




Good point Melody, I failed to see this. Ok so I think this is the right way,
To find the side lengths of the largest possible squares then you would have to find the greatest common factor of both 64 and 108 which is 4. Here is the why:

Another way to look at the length and width of this rectangle is that it tells you that you could fit 64x108 tiny boxes, all with side lengths of 1, inside the rectangle. If the side lengths of your overall rectangle have a common factor that means you could group up the little unit boxes into bigger ones. The biggest boxes you could possibly group them into will have side lengths of your greatest common factor which in this case is 4. If you draw yourself a picture in your head you'll see how it all works out.
Jan 20, 2014
 #2
avatar+118725 
0
MathPong:

Quadratic Functions

I need help with a question i got on my math book. It goes like this Solve the equation y = 0 graphically and algebrally. And i got a formula for this and it goes like: y = x*h and the h in the formula is 12 - x so i did this x(12-x) and i got this 12x-x^2. But its very confusing please help me its a Quadratic Function..



Thanks Walt, I just want to talk about this question because there is an easier way to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To solve algebraically you have x(12-x)=0
now if you multiply 2 things together and get 0 for an answer it means that one or the other or both must equal 0. Just think about that fo a moment and convince yourself that it is true.
Now
If x(12-x)=0 then
either x=0 or 12-x=0 and if 12-x=0 then x=12
so the algebraic solution is x=0 and x=12
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a bit strange to be asked to solve this graphically but because you effectively use the algebraic solution to graph it anyway.
But i will talk about it.
y= -x^2 +12x is a concave down parabola. It's a parabola because the highest power of x is 2. and it is concave down because the co-efficient of x^2 is negative.
Now I am going to put it back into the previous form
y=x(12-x)
The roots are 0 and 12
The roots are where y=0, or to put it another way they are the x intercepts (where the curve crosses the x axis)
The vertex (if you want to find it and you really don't need to) will have an x=(0+12)/2 = 6 SO y=6(12-6)=36
That is, the vertex is (6,36)
Now you have 3 points, that is enough to define a parabola, so draw the parabola.
Graphically, to solution to
0 = x(12-x) is the intersection of y=0 (the xaxis) and y=x(12-x)
you can read the intersection points off your graph. x=0 and x=12.
Jan 20, 2014

1 Online Users