Cerentie, you have lodge a complaint that people are being rude to you about the number of questions that you have asked.
Perhaps you are unaware of just how many questions you ARE posting.
27 of the last 100 questions are yours!!
How can you possibly be learning from all of these?
We are not here to do your homework for you.
We are not even here to check every one of your answers.
The answerers here want to help people to learn. They are a wonderfully generous and knowledgeable collection of people.
When I see people aske this many question I usually skip over them and help the people who are less demanding.
I know you are not the only offender. There are a couple of others as well, particularly Samjones and Angleray
Actually it is funny because I just realised that the person who you thought was being rude to you was not being rude at all!
They were just amused by your spelling mistake LOL. Their quip was funny :)
https://web2.0calc.com/questions/pls-help-geometry-question#r1
The following diagram illustrates the gist of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra.
\(P(x)=\underbrace{ax^n+bx^{n-1}+cx^{n-2}+...+yx+z}\\ \hspace{30mm}\text{n complex roots}\)
The degree of the polynomial of \(2x^2+8x+14\) is 2, so the number of complex roots is also 2.
You can use the quadratic formula to find those roots.
\(2x^2+8x+14=0\) | Apply the quadratic formula! |
\(x_{1,2}=\frac{-8\pm\sqrt{8^2-4*2*14}}{2*2}\) | Now it is a matter of simplifying. |
\(x_{1,2}=\frac{-8\pm\sqrt{64-112}}{4}\) | |
\(x_{1,2}=\frac{-8\pm\sqrt{-48}}{4}\) | |
\(x_{1,2}=\frac{-8\pm\sqrt{48*-1}}{4}\) | |
\(x_{1,2}=\frac{-8\pm i\sqrt{48}}{4}\) | |
\(x_{1,2}=\frac{-8\pm i\sqrt{16*3}}{4}\) | |
\(x_{1,2}=\frac{-8\pm 4i\sqrt{3}}{4}\) | |
\(x_{1,2}=-2\pm i\sqrt{3}\) | |
#1)
One way to approach this problem is to add up the sides of all the faces. All the faces are rectangular-shaped, so finding their individual area is not too difficult.
\(A_{\text{AGFD}}=lw\) | This is the formula for the area of this side. Its length (l) is 6 units, and the width (w) is 4 units. |
\(A_{\text{AGFD}}=6*4\) | |
\(A_{\text{AGFD}}=24\text{ square units}\) | Area is always represented as a square unit since it measures in two dimensions. |
We can do the same calculation for the other faces.
\(A_{\text{ABCD}}=lw\) | Use the diagram to find these lengths. |
\(A_{\text{ABCD}}=6*2\) | |
\(A_{\text{ABCD}}=12\text{ square units}\) | |
\(A_{CDFE}=lw\) | We might as well find the other one, too. |
\(A_{\text{CDFE}}=4*2\) | |
\(A_{\text{CDFE}}=8\text{ square units}\) | |
Because the above figure is a rectangular prism, the opposite face is equal to one that I already found.
\(SA_{total}=2(A_{\text{AGFD}}+A_{\text{ABCD}}+A_{\text{CDFE}}\) | Let's plug in the values we know. |
\(SA_{total}=2(24+12+8)\) | One luxury unique to addition and multiplication is that you can perform the calculation in any order you desire; therefore, I will find the sum of 12 and 8 because they add up to a number where its last digit is zero. |
\(SA_{total}=2(24+20)\) | |
\(SA_{total}=2(44)\) | |
\(SA_{total}=88\text{ square units}\) | |
#2)
A dihedral angle is formed when two planes intersect. \(\angle JAB\) has the same measure because it is included in the dihedral angle.
AngelRay, my strategy here would be to convert all inequalities to slope-intercept form (\(y=mx+b\)). Converting to slope-intercept form is useful because the form gives one information about how a graph should look. I can, then, compare this information with the four graphs given.
\(x-y<-1\) | Add x to both sides. |
\(-y<-x-1\) | Divide by -1 on both sides. Doing this causes an equality signage change. |
\(y>x+1\) | |
The point-intercept form gives us some information about the corresponding graph of this equation. I will name two of these.
Every graph appears to have the correct slope, but the coordinate of the y-intercept changes from graph to graph. Only the first and last graphs have a y-intercept of \((1,0)\) . Therefore, we have already eliminated two graphs from the list. Notice that the inequality would result in a dashed line. Only the last graph accounts for this technicality, so the bottom-right one is the correct graph.