Thanks for complementing me on my answer Chris.
I'm sure you know better than most that when we put a lot of effort into an answer like this we do want someone to notice.
I mean we get our own satisfaction but still it is nice if we have a small appreciative audience as well.
You provide so many excellent geometry answers, I did not think you would notice this one.
".I did not know the thing about the exterior angle of a cyclic quad = the opposite interior angle"
I kind of extrapolated that ...
One of the most important features of a cyclic quad is that opposite angles are supplementary.
I was going to use that.
But then I realised that since this is true it means, by extension, that the exterior angle of a cyclic quad is equal to the opposite internal angle.
It just meant that I could skip one step in the proof, that is all. :)
------------------------------------
With these proofs I am sometimes a bit confused about when I should use the 'congruent to' sign and when I should just use the equal sign. Do you have any confusion over this?
-----------------------------------
Did you see Rosala's question about series that are combinations of Arithmetic Progressions and Geometric progressions?
She asked for the formula derivation to be explained and then she had 2 questions using it.
I answered the first, but I couldn't do the second.
It was 'new' maths for me and quite interesting.
I'll see if I can find the link.
Arr, I can see Heureka is answering it now :))
https://web2.0calc.com/questions/this-is-so-annoying-pls-help-me