OMG! Melody! How could you give this post a point and a CHECK mark?
This is like rating a bond in default as “AA”
Mr. BB’s interpretation is not just a blarney banker interpretation; it is blatant bullshit!
The (a) and (b) are digits of a number. For (71_a), (a) is the final digit.
There a minus sign used in the question, so the asker is not confused about it.
I recall someone describing a kangaroo as a large mouse. That was quite funny. This isn’t!
Related post: https://web2.0calc.com/questions/what-is-the-sum-of-the-odd-numbers-from-1-to-387#r1
GA
I wonder who could have posted this BLARNEY.
Who could it be?
Now, let me tink about it ...
I know, I know! It’s THE BLARNY BANKER! ... It’s THE BLARNY BANKER!
There are psychology texts describing visual comprehension: What a person doesn’t understand he cannot see, so he will see what he can understand. The word, “see” in this context does not refer to comprehension it refers to literal vision.
You (usually) understand arithmetic and geometric progressions, so this is what you see. It’s WRONG (here), but you see it clearly.
In this post, https://web2.0calc.com/questions/help-me-please_14591#r1
You see a minus sign, because that is what you understand, so that is what you use to “solve the problem. That is WRONG, too.
You should be pleased Mr. BB, I’ve used you (in context of your posts) in no less than four research papers: Cognitive learning, abnormal behaviors, analysis, and Learning curves: Statistical analysis by age groups – aka Teaching Old Blarney Bankers New Tricks.
For case examples, I refer to you as Mr. BB, instead of Mr. X.
GA