Questions   
Sort: 
 #5
avatar+7188 
+5
Nov 20, 2014
 #2
avatar
+5
Nov 20, 2014
 #2
avatar+26400 
+5
Nov 20, 2014
 #1
avatar+23254 
+5
Nov 20, 2014
 #8
avatar+2236 
+5

Hi Lancelot,

 

Your introductory post is not on the forum anymore. I was hoping to make a proper copy. I made an image on my phone, it’s only a thumbnail sized one, and not very readable. :(

 

I was in class still recovering from the Banana Phone post, when the translation of CPhill’s Wile e Coyote’s Latin popped up. You know how hard it is for us chimps to suppress laughter. My professor interrupted his lecture to ask if I was all right: He thought I was stroking out.

 

Are you looking for new talent? I would be pleased and honored to join your troop!

 

For me, maths used to cause abhorrent abominations and abstract algebraic afflictions of agony. Now, after studying this forum for months, I found the root of the problem, and even though my math skills are still down at the base, near the roots, I am well on my way to climbing the evolutionary maths tree.

 

Right now, I am studying Lagrange formulas in an attempt to find a solution to convert three-body libration points into two-body libration points. Making the orbital relationship binary should make things much simpler and more stable. Wouldn’t you agree?

Here are two equations that seem to work well at reducing this complexity.

 

$$\\ 9x-7i>3(3x-7u)\\
\ 9x-7i>9x-21u \\
\ -9x -9x -7i>-21u \\\
\ -7i \div -7 >-21u \div-7 \\\
= i<3u \\

\ And \\

\noindent
\ x^2 + (y-\sqrt[\leftroot{-2}\uproot{2} 3]{x^2})^2 = 1$$

 

Though my math skills are still wanting, my artistic and philosophy skills are paramount. I also make a great banana daiquiri, so I think I would fit in somewhere in your troop.

A proposal submitted for your consideration:

Perhaps we could have libations while studying librations and other complex relations?

 

Ginger

 

P.S. I posted this shortly after your cuddle-worthy kitten post, but it disappeared. I waited to repost because I thought it might return. I don’t think it will, but I hope you do soon.

****

Edit:

Here’s Lancelot’s reply and an extract of our dialogue.smiley

Nov 20, 2014
 #1
avatar+23254 
+5

I'm going to assume that the choices are random choices, otherwise, Bill could always choose to win.

I'm also going to assume that the game is played "with replacement", meaning that both players choose from all four posibilities, not that one player gets two of the numbers, while the other player gets the two that are left. 

So, what are the possibilities for Darla?

1 + 2 = 3     1 + 3 = 4     1 + 4 = 5       2 + 3 = 5     2 + 4 = 6     3 + 4 = 7

There are 6 possibilities for Darla (we must count the two ways for Darla to get 5 as separate possibilities).

Now, what are the possibilities for Bill?

1 x 2 = 2     1 x 3 = 3     1 x 4 = 4     2 x 3 = 6     2 x 4 = 8     3 x 4 = 12

Each of the possibilities for Bill has a 1/6th chance of occuring.

In how many different ways can Darla beat Bill when

Bill gets 2?  6 ways  So Carla has a 6/6 chance to win.

Bill gets 3?  5 ways  So Carla has a 5/6 chance to win.

Bill gets 4? 4 ways  So Carla has a 4/6 chance to win.

Bill gets 6?  1 way  So Carla has a 1/6 chance to win.

Bill gets 8?  0 ways  So Carla has a 0/6 chance to win.

Bill ets 12?  0 ways  So Carla has a 0/6 chance to win.

So now we need to multiply the probability that Bill gets a certain result times the probability that Darla beats him and add all those results together:

(1/6)(6/6) + (1/6)(5/6) + (1/6)(4/6) + (1/6)(1/6) + (1/6)(0/6) + (1/6)(0/6)  =  16/36  =  4/9

The probability that Darla beats bill is  4/9.

If the choice is "without replacement" (one of them gets two of the numbers, the other gets the other two numbers) needs a different analysis. Re-post if that is the problem.

Nov 20, 2014
 #1
avatar+7188 
+8
Nov 20, 2014

0 Online Users