Questions   
Sort: 
 #3
avatar+118725 
+31

Fractions on the calculator:  

This is a page that Kitty put together for us a little while ago.  Once again - thanks Kitty<3 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In answer to all those people who want to know how to do fractions on this calculator:

Here are some of the replies from various answers; I hope they can help you out:

 

Re: How do you do fractions on this calculator?

"5 and a half - 8 and a quarter would be

$$\left({\mathtt{5}}{\mathtt{\,\small\textbf+\,}}{\frac{{\mathtt{1}}}{{\mathtt{2}}}}\right){\mathtt{\,-\,}}\left({\mathtt{8}}{\mathtt{\,\small\textbf+\,}}{\frac{{\mathtt{1}}}{{\mathtt{4}}}}\right) = -{\mathtt{2.75}}$$ "(by Melody)

 

Re: where is the fraction button

"It is a box above a box" (by Anonymous)

"On many calculators out guest is correct. There is no fraction button on the Web2.0calc  You have to use the $$\div$$ button. To enter 3 and 1/2 - 6 and a quarter you would press

$$(3+1\div2)-(6+1\div 4)=$$" (by Melody)

 

Re: How do we use fractions on this calculator??

"with the $$\div$$ button. If you are doing calculations with mixed numerals it is best to put them in brackets like $$(3+1\div 2)$$" (by Melody)

"You can use forward slash / as we write in a fraction. 6/2 is a fraction. And if there are more numerals involved, use brackets as (6*2+8)/4

I hope it helps." (by novice)

"you simply make it a decmil if 4 were 1/4 i would put 4.25" (by Gman2598)

Thanks to everyone who answered!

 

by kitty<3 (Apr 28, 2014 5:44:22 PM)

May 4, 2014
 #1
avatar+130561 
+3

Let's see if I remember any of Cal II

I believe that since we're expanding about 0 that we have a Maclaurin series. The expansion of this is given by

Sometimes, the most tedious thing about this activity (as you have probably discovered) is taking the derivatives. Let's do that for the first few terms and see if we can arrive at a "pattern".

f(0) = 1 - cos(0^2) =1- cos(0) = 1- 1 = 0

f'(x) = 2xsin(x^2)    f'(0) = 0

f"(x) = 2sin(x^2) + 4x^2cos(x^2)       f"'(0) = 0

f'''(x) = -8x^3sin(x^2) + 12xcos(x^2)     f'''(0) = 0

f''''(x) = -48x^2sin(x^2) - 16^4cos(x^2) + 12cos(x^2)       f''''(0) = 12

At this point, we can probably stop.

So far, the only term is     (12)x^4 / 4!    =    (x^4) /2

Taking successive derivatives (very tedious, indeed) until we reached f8(x) would yield  "0' terms

From an online app, the next non-zero terms occur at f8(x), f12(x), and f16(x) - as we might now expect.

x^4\/2-x^8\/24+x^12\/720-x^16\/40320+O(x^18)
 
So it appears that we have this .....
 
  [(-1) n+1( x 4n )] / [(2n)! ]  for n= 1, 2, 3.......
 
And the series would  be written as
 
f(x) =  1 + (n=0, ∞)∑ [(-1) n+1( x 4n )] / [(2n)! ]
 
Note that we need the (1) because of the "-1" that the series would generate by starting at n=0. In effect, this "erases" that term. We could start the series at n=1, but then it wouldn't be in Maclaurin form.
 
Sorry...I don't know (yet) how to put the "n=0"  and the infinity sign "under"  and "over" the summa symbol, but I think you get the idea!!
 
I think that's it !!
 
May 4, 2014
 #1
avatar
+24

 

Why does my (oldish) Texas Instruments not have a PRB button?

------

It would be unusual for old TI to have that button. You would have to go way back to find that button on any machine. My 1947 Burroughs advanced differential adding machine had one (See photo). Of course, this unit came with the optional complex matrix integrator, and statistical processing system, that might be why.

By the early 1970s with the electronic calculators, these options were no longer available – it could not even do a simple square root, let alone generate complex solutions.

Doing that was worse than replacing vacuum tubes with transistors; don’t even get me started on integrated circuits. Another thing, just as bad: the libraries replaced the card catalogs with the new-fangled electronic lookup machines. I really enjoyed separating cards, stuck together from gooey fingers and careless sneezes. God, I miss those days!

It was a conspiracy; I tell you … A real conspiracy! But they couldn’t take my slide rule away from me. No sir! I was smart – I hid it in my sock. Pretty sneaky, wasn’t it? 

Finally, in the last few months the electronic technology is starting to catch-up to the advanced mechanical technology of the 1930s and 40s. It is still not as good, though. The PRB button on those old machines is still more advanced than any PRB button on modern machines.

So, if you want to find a PRB button on an older unit, you will have to go back 60 or more years, everything in-between are the very dark ages.

I wish they still made parts for those Burroughs adding machines. It’s no wonder us old geezers live in the past. I miss the good old days.

Giddy-up, Frances, else we ain’t gonna make it home before dark.

Reluctantly Modern Old Geezer

 

 

 

https://i.imgur.com/qcttXTH.jpg

May 4, 2014
May 3, 2014
 #1
avatar+118725 
+5
May 3, 2014

3 Online Users

avatar